A Comparison Between two Different α-Particle Wave Functions via Heavy ion Scattering

YANG Yong-Xu; LI Qing-Run

近期发现有不法分子冒充我刊与作者联系，借此进行欺诈等不法行为，请广大作者加以鉴别，如遇诈骗行为，请第一时间与我刊编辑部联系确认（《中国物理C》（英文）编辑部电话：010-88235947,010-88236950），并作报警处理。

本刊再次郑重声明：

（1）本刊官方网址为cpc.ihep.ac.cn和https://iopscience.iop.org/journal/1674-1137

（2）本刊采编系统作者中心是投稿的唯一路径，该系统为ScholarOne远程稿件采编系统，仅在本刊投稿网网址（https://mc03.manuscriptcentral.com/cpc）设有登录入口。本刊不接受其他方式的投稿，如打印稿投稿、E-mail信箱投稿等，若以此种方式接收投稿均为假冒。

（3）所有投稿均需经过严格的同行评议、编辑加工后方可发表，本刊不存在所谓的“编辑部内部征稿”。如果有人以“编辑部内部人员”名义帮助作者发稿，并收取发表费用，均为假冒。

《中国物理C》（英文）编辑部

2024年10月30日

Chinese Physics C> 1992, Vol. 16> Issue(8) : 762-764

A Comparison Between two Different α-Particle Wave Functions via Heavy ion Scattering

YANG Yong-Xu ^, ,
LI Qing-Run

Department of Physics,Guangxi Normal University,Guilin 5410012 Institute of High Energy Physics,Academia Sinica,Beijing 100039

Abstract
HTML
Reference
Related

PDF

Abstract：
The independent α-particle model wavefunction and the wavefunction with the simple Gaussain form are tested by means of the heavy ion scattering.The experimental data obviously support the former but are unfavorable to the later.

References

[1]

Farid M. El-Azab, J. Phys., G: 16(1990), 461.[2] Farid M. El-Azab, J. Phys，G: 15(1989), 1437.[3] S, A, E, Rhallaf:‘al., d, Phys,,G:8(1992), 1721,[4] Li Qing-run, Chinesc Pltys: Get:., 9(1992), 349.[5] 李清润、陈生忠、赵愚广，高能物理与核物理，5(1981)，531,[6] B. Buck, H. Friedrich and C. Wheathly, Nucl. Phys., A275(1977), 246[7] P. P. Singh et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 23(1969), 1124.[8] H. Abele et al., Z. Phys., A328(1987), 373.

[1]	SHI Yuan-Mei , PING Jia-Lun , HE Han-Xin . Two Renormalization Approaches for the Dyson-Schwinger Equations in the Infrared. Chinese Physics C, 2006, 30(9): 833-837.
[2]	MO Xiao-Hu . Further Corroboration of Equivalence of Two χ² Forms. Chinese Physics C, 2006, 30(2): 140-146.
[3]	LU Xiao , LI Qing-Run , ZHAO Wei-Qin . A Comparison Between Two Different Optical Potentials for the ³He+ ¹²C Scattering at the Energy 72MeV. Chinese Physics C, 2004, 28(1): 53-55.
[4]	MO Xiao-Hu , ZHU Yong-Sheng . Equivalence of Two χ² Forms. Chinese Physics C, 2003, 27(5): 371-376.
[5]	SHAO Feng-Lan , XIE Qu-Bing . Ratio of Baryon to Meson and Baryon Antibaryon Correlation in e⁺e^－ Annihilation under Two Kinds of Color Connections. Chinese Physics C, 2002, 26(8): 779-785.
[6]	CHENG Nan-Pu , ZHENG Ren-Rong , ZHU Shun-Quan . Quasiparticles Plus Rotor Model and the Analysisof Level Statistics of Odd-Odd Nucleus. Chinese Physics C, 2001, 25(8): 736-742.
[7]	XIAO Jing , RUAN TuNan . Equations and Wave Functions of Integral Spin Particle. Chinese Physics C, 2000, 24(7): 631-635.
[8]	Dai Guangxi , Wu Heyu , Fu Yanbiao , Duan Limin , He Zhiyong , Li Zuyu , Zhang Baoguo , Liu Guoxing . Two Modes in Three-fold Fragmentation of hot Nuclei. Chinese Physics C, 1999, 23(1): 51-58.
[9]	Li Long . Two Kinds of Signature Splittings in Odd-A Superdeformed Nuclei. Chinese Physics C, 1998, 22(8): 732-738.
[10]	Shen Qixing , Chao Ming , Yu Hong . Moment Analysis of J/ψ Decay Processes and Comparison of Results in Two Frames. Chinese Physics C, 1997, 21(5): 408-412.
[11]	Wu Lianao , Ding Huiming , Jing Xiaogong . A Microscopic Two-Parameter Nuclear Model and Its Application to the Yrast Lines of Actinide Nuclei. Chinese Physics C, 1996, 20(2): 182-184.
[12]	Li Qingrun , Yang Yongxu . A Comparison of Two Different Models for ¹²C+¹²C Scattering. Chinese Physics C, 1994, 18(12): 1115-1118.
[13]	QIU Rong . THE EQUIVALENCE OF TWO TRANSFORMATIONS OF THE INVARIANCE OF LAGRANGIAN FUNCTION IN NON-ABELIAN GAUGE FIELD. Chinese Physics C, 1989, 13(4): 302-308.
[14]	LU Jian-Xin , RUAN Tu-Nan . GAUGE TRANSFORMATION IN STRING THEORY. Chinese Physics C, 1989, 13(4): 309-315.
[15]	LIN Chun-Zhen , WU Chong-Shi , ZENG Jin-Yan . SENIORITY AND K-STRUCTURE OF THE CARNKED SHELL MODEL WAVE FUNCTION (Ⅰ) EVEN-EVEN NUCLEI. Chinese Physics C, 1988, 12(5): 689-696.
[16]	LIN Xin-Wei , LIAO Bo-Qin , TANG Xiang-Hong , WU Chong-Shi , ZENG Jin-Yan . SENIORITY AND K-STRUCTURE OF THE CRANKED SHELL MODEL WAVE FUNCTION (Ⅱ) ODD-A NUCLEI. Chinese Physics C, 1988, 12(6): 807-813.
[17]	WANG Bai-Lu . THE ENERGY SPECTRUM AND WAVEFUNCTION OF NUCLEUS 31Si——A TEST ON THE COMPOSITE PARTICLE REPRESENTATION THEORY. Chinese Physics C, 1986, 10(3): 358-362.
[18]	MIAO Rong-Zhi , WU Guo-Hua , ZHENG Wei-Han , LIU Jian-Ye , YU Chao-Fan , YU Xie . A MODIFICATION FOR COMPLEX-PARTICLE EMISSION PROBABILITY IN THE PRE-EQUILIBRIUM EXCITON MODEL. Chinese Physics C, 1985, 9(1): 95-100.
[19]	LIU BO , JIANG HUAN-CHING , LI YANG-GUO . A TWO-NUCLEON MODEL OF THE（p,π^-） REACTION. Chinese Physics C, 1979, 3(2): 247-254.
[20]	LI BING-AN , RUAN TONG-ZE . WAVE FUNCTIONS WITHOUT SU₆ SYMMETRY IN THE STRATON MODEL AND THEIR APPLICATIONS. Chinese Physics C, 1979, 3(1): 1-18.

Access

Get Citation

YANG Yong-Xu and LI Qing-Run. A Comparison Between two Different α-Particle Wave Functions via Heavy ion Scattering[J]. Chinese Physics C, 1992, 16(8): 762-764.

YANG Yong-Xu and LI Qing-Run. A Comparison Between two Different α-Particle Wave Functions via Heavy ion Scattering[J]. Chinese Physics C, 1992, 16(8): 762-764. shu

RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)

BibTex

Txt

Milestone

Received: 1900-01-01
Revised: 1900-01-01

Article Metric

Article Views(2234)
PDF Downloads(442)
Cited by(0)

Policy on re-use

To reuse of subscription content published by CPC, the users need to request permission from CPC, unless the content was published under an Open Access license which automatically permits that type of reuse.

通讯作者: 陈斌, [email protected]

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

A Comparison Between two Different α-Particle Wave Functions via Heavy ion Scattering

YANG Yong-Xu ^,
LI Qing-Run

Corresponding author: YANG Yong-Xu,

Department of Physics,Guangxi Normal University,Guilin 5410012 Institute of High Energy Physics,Academia Sinica,Beijing 100039

Received Date: 1900-01-01
Accepted Date: 1900-01-01
Available Online: 1992-08-05

Abstract: The independent α-particle model wavefunction and the wavefunction with the simple Gaussain form are tested by means of the heavy ion scattering.The experimental data obviously support the former but are unfavorable to the later.