Potential pollution of the Kπ-puzzle by the isospin-breaking π0-η-η' mixing effect

Tables(1)

Get Citation
Zhen-Hua Zhang. Possible pollution to the Kπ-puzzle from the isospin-breaking π0-η-η' mixing effect[J]. Chinese Physics C. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ac7317
Zhen-Hua Zhang. Possible pollution to the Kπ-puzzle from the isospin-breaking π0-η-η' mixing effect[J]. Chinese Physics C.  doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ac7317 shu
Milestone
Received: 2022-03-22
Article Metric

Article Views(1678)
PDF Downloads(36)
Cited by(0)
Policy on re-use
To reuse of Open Access content published by CPC, for content published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license (“CC CY”), the users don’t need to request permission to copy, distribute and display the final published version of the article and to create derivative works, subject to appropriate attribution.
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Email This Article

Title:
Email:

Potential pollution of the Kπ-puzzle by the isospin-breaking π0-η-η' mixing effect

    Corresponding author: Zhen-Hua Zhang, zhangzh@usc.edu.cn
  • College of Nuclear Science and Technology, University of South China, Hengyang 421001, China

Abstract: The influence of the isospin-breaking π0ηη mixing effect on the CP-asymmetries of BKπ processes is examined for the first time. It is found that this mixing effect presents significant uncertainty for both the CP-asymmetry sum rule of BKπ processes and the CP-asymmetry difference of B+K+π0 and B0K+π, potentially obscuring the significance of the Kπ-puzzle. As the correction caused by the π0ηη mixing effect is highly dependent on four strong non-perturbative phases, a definitive conclusion is currently unavailable.

    HTML

    I.   BRIEF INTRODUCTION TO THE Kπ-PUZZLE
    • BKπ decay processes provide good probes for new physics (NP) beyond the Standard Model (SM) as tree-level amplitudes are suppressed, increasing their sensitivity to potential NP contributions. Based on the isospin consideration, the amplitudes ofBKπ weak decays are related by [13]

      AB+K0π++2AB+K+π0=AB0K+π+2AB0K0π0,

      (1)

      from which a sum rule between the CP asymmetries of BKπ processes is derived [4]:

      AK+πCP+B(K0π+)B(K+π)τ0τ+AK0π+CP=2B(K+π0)B(K+π)τ0τ+AK+π0CP+2B(K0π0)B(K+π)τ0τ+AK0π0CP.

      (2)

      The CP-asymmetry sum rule can be further simplified to a more crude relation between the CP asymmetries of B+K+π0 and B0K+π [5]:

      AK+π0CPAK+πCP0,

      (3)

      which clearly contradicts the latest world average of the CP-asymmetry difference between the two processes [611]:

      ΔACP(Kπ)AK+π0CPAK+πCP=0.115±0.014.

      (4)

      This is essentially a shortened version of the long-standingKπ-puzzle.

      The Kπ-puzzle has received significant theoretical attention, particularly from studies exploring the possibility of NP [1220]. Additionally there are studies attempting to understand it within the SM [2126]. This paper examines the role of the isospin breaking π0ηη mixing effect in the Kπ-puzzle. The effects of π0ηη mixing on the CP asymmetries of B meson decays have been studied in several decay channels, such as Bππ [27, 28].

    II.   POLLUTION OF THE K π -PUZZLE BY THE π0ηη MIXING EFFECT
    • The basic principle is that, as there are π0s in the final states of BKπ decay processes, the isospin-breaking π0ηη mixing effect [2933] occurs. This effect initially appears negligible [34], which is perhaps why its influence on the Kπ-puzzle has not previously been examined. However, isospin-breaking effects potentially affect CP asymmetries more signficantly than previously assumed [35].

      Within the context of the π0ηη mixing effect, the π0 meson can be expressed as an admixture of the isospin eigenstate π3 and the mass eigenstates η and η,

      |π0=|π3+ϵ|η+ϵ|η,

      (5)

      where ϵ and ϵ are small parameters accounting for the mixing between π0 and η and η, respectively [30, 31]. Both the branching ratios and the CP asymmetry parameters of B+K+π0 and B0K0π0 require corrections because of the π0ηη mixing effect. Taking the decay process B+K+π0 as an example, the full decay amplitude can be expressed as

      AB+K+π0=AB+K+π3+AB+K+ηϵ+AB+K+ηϵ,

      (6)

      accounting for the π0ηη mixing effect. Up to O(ϵ) and O(ϵ), the branching ratio of B+K+π0 can be expressed as

      BB+K+π0=BB+K+π3[1+2(AB+K+ηAB+K+π0)ϵ+2(AB+K+ηAB+K+π0)ϵ],

      (7)

      where BB+K+π3 is the branching ratio of B+K+π3, which is also the branching ratio of B+K+π0 in the absence of the π0ηη mixing effect.

      The CP asymmetry of B+K+π0 is modified to

      AK+π0CP=AK+π3CP+ΔK+π0IB

      (8)

      because of the π0ηη mixing effect, where AK+π3CP is the CP asymmetry of the decay channel K+π3, taking the form AK+π3CP|ABKπ3|2|AB+K+π3|2|ABKπ3|2+|AB+K+π3|2. ΔK+π0IB represents the correction of the π0ηη mixing effect to the CP asymmetry of B+K+π0. Up to O(ϵ) and O(ϵ), this can be expressed as

      ΔK+π0IB=[(ABKηABKπ0AB+K+ηAB+K+π0)ϵ+(ABKηABKπ0AB+K+ηAB+K+π0)ϵ].

      (9)

      To account for the potential relative phases between the decay amplitudes, which could arise from effects such as final state interactions, two strong phases θ and θ are introduced to Eq. (9), which becomes

      ΔK+π0IB=[(ABKηABKπ0AB+K+ηAB+K+π0)eiθϵ+(ABKηABKπ0AB+K+ηAB+K+π0)eiθϵ].

      (10)

      Similarly, the CP asymmetry of B0K0π0 is modified to

      AK0π0CP=AK0π3CP+ΔK0π0IB,

      (11)

      where the correction term is expressed as

      ΔK0π0IB=[(A¯B0¯K0ηA¯B0¯K0π0AB0K0ηAB0K0π0)ei˜θϵ+(A¯B0¯K0ηA¯B0¯K0π0AB0K0ηAB0K0π0)ei˜θϵ].

      (12)

      The different behaviors of the π0ηη mixing effect in the branching ratios and the CP asymmetry parameters can be easily determined through a comparison of Eqs. (7) and (8). The π0ηη mixing effect is clearly negligible for the branching ratios in Eq. (7). However, its contribution to the CP asymmetry parameters, ΔK+π0IB, cannot be neglected, as a small CP asymmetry parameter AK+π3CP is potentially comparable with ΔK+π0IB. Moreover, with a large difference between the amplitudes of the pair of CP-conjugate processes B±K±η() , ΔK+π0IB can be further enlarged. This is the case for B±K±η, as the CP asymmetry of this process is as large as0.37±0.08 [36], indicating a large difference between the corresponding decay amplitudes of the CP-conjugate processes.

      The influence of the π0ηη mixing effect in Eqs. (2) and (3) can now be studied. As these two equations are obtained under the ignorance of the the π0ηη mixing effect, the π0s are the isospin eigenstates π3s. Consequently, Eqs. (2) and (3) are rewritten as

      AK+πCP+B(K0π+)B(K+π)τ0τ+AK0π+CP=2B(K+π3)B(K+π)τ0τ+AK+π3CP+2B(K0π3)B(K+π)τ0τ+AK0π3CP,

      (13)

      and

      AK+π3CPAK+πCP0,

      (14)

      respectively. It should be noted that all the branching ratios and CP asymmetries containing π3 in the final state are not strictly physically observable. However, this issue can be resolved using Eqs. (8) and (11) and by rewriting Eqs. (13) and (14) in terms of the physical branching ratios and CP asymmetries with π0s contained in the final states. The CP-asymmetry sum rule and the CP-asymmetry difference are now expressed as

      AK+πCP+B(K0π+)B(K+π)τ0τ+AK0π+CP=2B(K+π0)B(K+π)τ0τ+AK+π0CP+2B(K0π0)B(K+π)τ0τ+AK0π0CPΔIB,

      (15)

      and

      AK+π0CPAK+πCPΔIB,

      (16)

      respectively, where ΔIB accommodates the π0ηη mixing correction and takes the form

      ΔIB=2B(K+π0)B(K+π)τ0τ+ΔK+π0IB+2B(K0π0)B(K+π)τ0τ+ΔK0π0IB.

      (17)

      Note that the π0ηη mixing corrections from the branching ratios B(K+π0) and B(K0π0), which are proportional to AK+,0π0CPϵ(), are neglected in ΔIB asAK+,0π0CP are signficantly less than 1.

      An interesting behavior of this modification is that, although Eq. (3) relates only the CP asymmetries of B0K+π and B+K+π0, the isospin-breaking correction term ΔIB in Eq. (16) contains not only the contribution of the process B+K+π0, but also that of the process B0K0π0. The latter is of greater numerical importance in ΔIB. The reason for the presence of ΔK0π0IB in Eq. (16) is that it is not obtained by substituting Eq. (8) into Eq. (14). If that were the case, Eq. (16) would read as AK+π0CPAK+πCPΔK+π0IB. Instead, Eq. (16) is derived from Eq. (15), which follows a similar logic to obtaining Eq. (3) from Eq. (2). In this respect, the approximate relation of Eq. (16) is more reasonable, as its isospin-breaking contributions are more complete.

      The impact of the the isospin-breaking correction term ΔIB on the Kπ-puzzle can now be estimated. The amplitudes in Eqs. (10) and (12) can be calculated theoretically via various approaches, such as QCD factorization [37, 38], perturbative QCD factorization [39, 40], soft collinear effective theory [41], or strategies with the aid of experimental data [23, 25]. However, the four strong phases θ, θ, ˜θ, and ˜θare non-perturbative, which prevents an accurate prediction of ΔIB. Nevertheless, it is possible to obtain an approximate estimation of the possible range of ΔIB by treating the four strong phases as free parameters, varying from 0 to 2π independently. Based on this strategy, using the amplitudes from Ref. [23], the latest world average values of the branching ratios, and the life times from Particle Data Group [37], ΔIB is estimated as

      ΔIB=(0.37,+0.37)×ϵ+(1.16,+1.16)×ϵ.

      (18)

      In Table 1, using different values of ϵ and ϵfrom different studies, the corresponding allowable range of ΔIB is calculated via Eq. (18). Note that the mixing parameters ϵ and ϵ take significantly different values in different studies, resulting in different ranges of ΔIB, as presented in the last column of the table. From Table 1 it can be seen that the isospin-breaking-correction term ΔIB ranges from 0.2 to 2.2% for different fitting values of ϵ and ϵ. As this range is quite large, a definitive conclusion is unobtainable. However, there is still a good chance that ΔIB can be as high as several percent, which indicates that the influence of the π0ηη mixing effect on the CP-asymmetry sum rule of BKπ and the CP-asymmetry difference of B+K+π0 and B0K+π cannot be ignored. Taking the CP-asymmetry difference between B+K+π0 and B0K+π as an example and combining Eq. (16) with the CP-asymmetry difference in Eq. (14), which is approximately zero in the isospin limit, provides the expression

      Reference ϵ(%) ϵ(%) ΔIB(%)
      Kroll [42] 1.7±0.2 0.4±0.1 (1.2,+1.2)
      Escribano et al. [43] 0.98±0.03 0.025±0.015 (0.4,+0.4)
      Escribano & Royo [32] 0.1±0.9 3.5±0.9 (4.1,+4.1)
      Benayoun et al. [44] 4.16±0.20 1.05±0.05 (3.0,+3.0)

      Table 1.  π0ηη mixing parameters from different references and their corresponding range of ΔIB. Only the central values of ϵ and ϵ are used when obtaining the range of ΔIB.

      AK+π3CPAK+πCP(AK+π0CPAK+πCP)+ΔIB,

      (19)

      where the CP-asymmetry difference in parentheses is the measured ΔACP(Kπ) in Eq. (4). Treating the ΔIB-term as an uncertainty, with the mixing parameters from Ref. [33], the CP-asymmetry difference is now expressed as

      AK+π3CPAK+πCP=0.115±0.014±0.041π0ηη=0.115±0.043,

      (20)

      from which it is clear that the uncertainty caused by the π0ηη mixing effect can be larger than the other experimental uncertainties combined. Hence, the significance of the nonzeroness of thisCP difference is considerably reduced to less than three standard deviations.

      It should be noted that the exact values of the π0ηη mixing correction term, ΔIB, depend highly on the values of the four strong phases. Here, the possible maximum pollution of the π0ηη mixing effect on the Kπ-puzzle has been estimated by treating the four phases as free varying parameters. However, when the limits of all four strong phases are zero, the value of ΔIB will be reduced significantly. More specifically, if ϵ and ϵ take the four different sets of values in Table 1, ΔIB would take the values of 0.1%, 0.02%, 1.0%, and 0.3%, respectively, under the zero-value limit for these four phases. Under this limit, the corrections of the π0ηη mixing effect are not sufficiently large to explain the Kπ-puzzle. All four values are negative, which can bring the central value of Eq. (20) closer to zero, thus slightly reducing the significance of the nonzeroness of this equation. In conclusion, further study on the determination of the values of the four strong phases is crucial to assess whether the π0ηη mixing effect provides considerable corrections for the CP asymmetries of channels involved in the Kπ-puzzle.

    III.   CONCLUSION
    • In conclusion, the contribution of the isospin-breaking π0ηη mixing effect to the CP asymmetries of BKπ was investigated in this paper. It was found that there is a high chance that the π0ηη mixing effect pollutes the Kπ-puzzle, to a greater degree than previously expected. This pollution is imbedded in the parameter ΔIB, which can present high uncertainty for the CP-asymmetry sum rule of BKπ and the CP-asymmetry difference of B+K+π0 and B0K+π. Although a definitive conclusion on the pollution from the π0ηη mixing effect is unobtainable, the analysis in this paper suggests that the implications on the Kπ-puzzle should be carefully considered.

    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • I thank Pablo Roig, Hsiang-nan Li, Xin Liu, and Xin-Qiang Li, for their helpful discussions.

Reference (44)

目录

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return