-
Quantum chromodynamics (QCD) constitutes the fundamental theory of the strong interaction. One of the main goals of relativistic heavy-ion collisions is to explore the phase structure of hot and dense QCD matter, which can be displayed in the
T−μB plane (T: temperature,μB : baryon chemical potential) of QCD phase diagram. Lattice QCD calculations confirmed that the transition between hadronic gas and quark-gluon plasma (QGP) is a smooth crossover atμB = 0 [1]. At the largeμB region, QCD-based models predicted that the phase transition is of the first order [2-6]. The QCD critical point (QCP) is the end point of the first order phase transitions boundary. Theoretically, many efforts have been made to locate the critical point in lattice QCD [7-11] and models [12], however its position and even the existence is still not confirmed yet. Therefore, from the experimental side, scientists are performing a systematical exploration of the phase structure of the QCD matter at high baryon density region. The search for the critical point is one of the main goals of the beam energy scan (BES) program at the relativistic heavy-ion collider (RHIC). It is also the main physics motivation for future accelerators, such as facility for anti-proton and ion research (FAIR) in Darmstadt and the nuclotron‐based ion collider facility (NICA) in Dubna. Experimental confirmation of the existence of the QCD critical point will be a milestone of exploring the nature of the QCD phase structure.In the vicinity of the QCP, the correlation length of the system and density fluctuations will become large. In the first phase of beam energy scan at RHIC (BES-I, 2010-2014), the STAR experiment has made two important measurements, which are dedicated to search for the QCP: 1). The measurement of the cumulants of net-proton, net-charge, and net-kaon multiplicity distribution [13–18] in Au+Au collisions at
√sNN= 7.7-200 GeV. One of the most striking findings is the observation of non-monotonic energy dependence of the fourth order net-proton cumulant ratios (C4/C2 ) in the most central (0%–5%) Au+Au collisions. We observe a minimum dip around 19.6 GeV and large increase at 7.7 GeV. The review of these results can be found in Ref. [19]. 2). The measurement of the light nuclei (deuteron and triton) production as well as derived neutron density fluctuations at RHIC. We observe a non-monotonic energy dependence of the neutron density fluctuations in central (0%–10%) Au+Au collisions with a maximum peak around 19.6 GeV [20, 21]. These non-monotonic behaviors, the dip and peak structures observed around 19.6 GeV, are qualitatively consistent with the theoretical predictions of the signature of the critical point [22-24].The QCD critical point was predicted to serve as an attractor of the trajectory evolution in the
T−μB plane, which is known as the QCP focusing effect [25, 26]. The entropy over the baryon density ratios/nb is constant along the isentropic trajectory. When the isentropic trajectory passes through the critical region in theT−μB plane, the transverse velocity (βT=pT/E ) dependence ofˉp/p ratio will exhibit anomalous behavior [26]. A detail calculation to demonstrate how the focusing effect could lead to anomalousβT dependence ofˉp/p ratio has been done [27]. Theˉp/p ratio will exhibit differentβT dependence trends with or without the QCP focusing effect. However, we did not observe this anomaly inβT dependence ofˉp/p in Au+Au collisions at RHIC-BES measured by the STAR experiment [28]. There are several reasons that could lead to suppressing the focusing effect onˉp/p . First, the contributions of strong and weak decay to proton and anti-proton are important in heavy-ion collisions [29-31]. Second, final state hadronic interactions between particles will dilute the QCP focusing effect. In this letter, we propose the transverse velocity dependence ofˉd/d ratio or heavier light anti-nuclei to light nuclei (3¯He/3He ,ˉt/t , ···) ratios as more robust signatures of searching for the QCP. Assuming thermal production of the light nuclei along the system evolution trajectory, the yield ratio of light nucleiˉd/d is more sensitive to theμB thanˉp/p , because of the ratior∝exp[−2A×μB/T] , A is the mass number of the particle. This means the production of light nuclei is more sensitive to the system evolution trajectory in the vicinity of QCP, which will cause the changing of T andμB of the system. One of the other advantages is that the decay contributions for light nuclei is negligible in heavy-ion collisions. In the following, we will formulate the QCP focusing effect on theβT dependence ofˉd/d and3¯He/3He ratios by applying the UrQMD and THERMUS model to calculate the dependence patterns for a hypothetical focusing trajectory. -
To simulate the focusing effect, we assume that the critical point lies at
(T,μB)=(162,360) MeV [8] and the system evolution receives the focusing effect in central Au + Au collisions at√sNN= 19.6 GeV with a chemical freeze-out point at(Tch,μB)=(152,188) MeV [28]. Besides the starting (critical point) and ending (chemical freeze-out point) points, the hydrodynamic conjectured trajectory with focusing effect is shown in Fig. 1. Following the methods in Refs. [25, 27], the normalized relative timet=L/Ltot is used to characterize the time scale of the isentropic trajectory on the QCD phase diagram. The system is evolving from the critical point along the conjectured trajectory to the chemical freeze-out point. The L represents the path length along the trajectory from the critical point to the considered point, andLtot is the total path length along the trajectory from the critical point to the chemical freeze-out point. The system is assumed to be in thermodynamical equilibrium and continues to emit particles. The number of particles A emitted at time t along the trajectory is calculated byFigure 1. (color online) Sketch of conjectured QCD phase diagram with crossover (black dashed line),
1st order phase transition boundary (black solid lines), and QCD critical point (red solid circle,(T,μB)=(162,360) MeV). A hypothetical system evolution trajectory (red dashed lines) is also plotted and ends with the chemical freeze-out point (blue solid circle).DA(t)=YA[T(t),μB(t)]∫10YA(t)dt×YA(t=1),
(1) where A is the type of particle.
YA(t) is the yield of particle A at a certain point on the trajectory, which is determined by a statistical thermal model THERMUS [32].YA(t=1) is the yield at the chemical freeze-out point and with the normalization condition∫10DA(t)dt=Y(t=1) . This means that the sum of the total number of emitting particles A equals to the particle multiplicity at chemical freeze-out.Time evolution of the particle ratios
Nˉp(t)/Np(t) ,Nˉd(t)/Nd(t) , andN3¯He(t)/N3He(t) for the focusing effect trajectory is shown in Fig. 2. Those ratios show an increasing trend as a function of time from the critical point (t=0 ) to the chemical freeze-out point (t=1 ) caused by the decreasingμB/T ratio along the focused trajectory. Because of the QCP focusing effect, the time evolution of three particle ratios is different and should be proportional toexp[−2A×μB/T] . TheNˉd(t)/Nd(t) is more gradual at the earlier stage and more abrupt at later stage thanNˉp(t)/Np(t) .Figure 2. (color online) Time evolution of
ˉp/p ,ˉd/d , and3¯He/3He ratios along ocusing trajectory.To obtain the
βT dependence of those ratios, one needs to know the relation between emission time t and transverse velocityβT . This relation can be obtained quantitatively by transport model, UrQMD [33]. UrQMD is based on relativistic Boltzmann dynamics involving binary hadronic reactions, which are commonly used to describe the freeze-out and breakup of the fireball produced in relativistic heavy-ion collisions into hadrons. Two dimensions ofβT−t distribution for p andˉp ,Np(β,t) andNˉp(β,t) are calculated by UrQMD Au+Au collisions at√sNN= 19.6 GeV with impact parametersb< 4 fm. The average emission time⟨temission⟩ as a function ofβT of p andˉp from UrQMD are shown in Fig. 3. We observe strongβT−t anti-correlation for p andˉp during the evolution of the system. This indicates that the particles with larger transverse velocity are freezed-out at earlier time. We also found⟨temission⟩ for p are larger thanˉp for a certainβT , which suggests larger freeze-out time for protons than anti-protons.Figure 3. (color online) UrQMD calculations for
βT dependence of average emission time of p andˉp at mid-rapidity|y|<0.3 in Au+Au collisions at√sNN= 19.6.Once obtaining the relation between emission time t and transverse velocity
βT , we can calculate theβT dependence ofˉp/p ratio (solid triangles) asˉp(βT)p(βT)=∫NUˉp(βT,t)dt∫NUp(βT,t)dt,
(2) where
NUˉp(βT,t) andNUp(βT,t) are theβT−t distribution forˉp and p, respectively. The results are shown in Fig. 4. Theˉp/p ratio from UrQMD shows an increasing trend as a function ofβT (uptoβT = 0.6) in the absence of the QCP focusing effect, as the UrQMD does not include the physics of critical point. Theˉd/d and3¯He/3He ratios from UrQMD should show similar trends as theˉp/p ratio, if the probability is similar of forming a light nuclei from nucleons and anti-nuclei from anti-nucleons.Figure 4. (color online)
ˉp/p ,ˉd/d , andˉt/t as a function ofβT from UrQMD and UrQMD + QCP focusing effect. Shaded band represents range ofpT/A from 0.5 to 2 GeV/c. A depicts the mass number of light nuclei.To obtain the
βT dependence of the anti-particle to particle ratio with QCP focusing effects, we convolute the time evolution of these ratios from Fig. 2 with theβT−t distribution from UrQMD. The multiplicity of certain particle withβT and t is calculated by the thermal model. That means theβT−t distribution of particle with QCP focusing effect can be calculated byNFEA(βT,t)=NUA(βT,t)∫NUA(βT,t)dβT×DA(t),
(3) where
A=ˉp,p,ˉd,d,⋯ . The normalizedβT−t distributionNU(βT,t)∫NU(βT,t)dβT for d andˉd are assumed to be the same as those for p andˉp in this study, as the light nuclei are coalesced by nucleons. TheβT−t distribution of3¯He and3He or heavier light nuclei can also be derived from the equations above. By usingβT−t distribution of particles with the QCP focusing effect obtained in Eq. (3), theβT dependence of anti-particle to particle ratio can be calculated by Eq. (2).We show the
βT dependence ofˉp/p ,ˉd/d , and3¯He/3He ratios with QCP focusing effect in Fig. 4. TheβT dependence ofˉt/t (triton) is similar to the results of3¯He/3He owing to the similar particle yield of the two types of particle. By comparing theˉp/p results from pure UrQMD calculations with those receiving the QCP focusing effect, we find very differentβT dependence trends. This means the QCP focusing effect can lead to anomaly inβT dependence of anti-particle to particle ratio. We observed that the slope of these ratios are almost flat at lowβT and become negative at higherβT . In our study, this shows that the heavier light nuclei are more sensitive to QCP. The heavier the particle is, the steeper slope we can observe. However, the production for anti-light nuclei is difficult to be measured at lower collision energy [34]. Thus, we propose usingβT dependence of anti-deuteron to deuteron ratio to search for QCD critical point in heavy-ion collisions.Experimentally, one needs to measure the
βT dependence ofˉp/p ratios as a function of energy, centrality, and rapidity and perform linear fits to obtain slopes. Negative slopes could indicate the system trajectories have passed through the critical region, and QCP is located on the right of the chemical freeze-out point of this collision energy due to the focusing effect. Then, a finer scan by looking at rapidity and centrality dependence of the slopes can further help to locate the QCP and the width of the critical region in the QCD phase diagram. ThepT spectra ofp(ˉp) andd(ˉd) at mid-rapidity have been measured in Au+Au collisions by the STAR experiment at RHIC BES-I [34-37] with energies√sNN= 7.7-200 GeV. In Fig. 5, theβT dependence of 0%–5% collision centrality forˉp/p and 0%-10% forˉd/d ratios are shown. The longitudinal momentumpz is smaller than the energy of particle at mid-rapidity, and the approximationβT=pT/E≈ pT/√m20+p2T is used in our analysis, where E andm0 are the energy and mass of particle. We performed linear fits to these data and found positive slopes forβT dependence ofˉp/p . The positive slopes forβT dependence ofˉd/d are also observed for all energies except 19.6 GeV. The decreasing trend ofˉd/d at highβT in central Au+Au collisions at√sNN= 19.6 GeV is consistent with the trend in Fig. 4 with QCP focusing effect. If the anomaly inβT dependence ofˉd/d at 19.6 GeV is indeed due to the QCP focusing effect, this indicates that the system evolution trajectories have passed through the critical region, and theμB of the QCP should be larger than the chemical freeze-outμB of 19.6 GeV. Currently, we observe a positive slope for theβT dependence ofˉd/d at 14.5 GeV and 11.5 GeV. However, this could be due to the limited statistics, which makes it difficult to measure the highβT region, especially forˉd .Figure 5. (color online)
βT dependence of 0%–5% centralˉp/p (left) and 0%–10% centralˉd/d (right) are derived from thepT spectra in Au+Au collisions measured by the STAR experiment at RHIC-BES energies [34-36]. Dashed lines depict the linear fit. Error bars shown in the figure combine both systematic and statistical errors. -
We studied the QCP focusing effect of
βT dependence onˉp/p ,ˉd/d , and3¯He/3He ratios. The focusing effect is modeled by convoluting the particle density along the focused trajectories and theβT−t distribution from the UrQMD model. The focusing effect will lead to a decreasing anti-particle to particle ratio when increasingβT . We examined and performed a linear fit to theβT dependence ofˉp/p andˉd/d , which are calculated from the STAR measuredpT spectra. We observed that only the fitting slope of theˉd/d at√sNN= 19.6 GeV is negative. The negative slope can be qualitatively explained in term of the QCP focusing effect, which might indicate that the system evolution trajectory at√sNN= 19.6 GeV has passed through the critical region. This anomaly could be potentially connected with the dip and peak structures observed at 19.6 GeV in the measurements of net-proton fluctuations and neutron density fluctuations, respectively, by the STAR experiment. We can make more precise measurements and pose further constraint on theμB value of QCP in the second phase of beam energy scan program (BES-II, 2019-2021) at RHIC [38]. Furthermore, sinceμB depends on rapidity, we could also perform a rapidity scan for thepT dependence ofˉd/d at each energy. This might allow us to map out the location of the QCP with a finerμB step. Finally, we predicted that theβT dependence of heavier anti-light nuclei to light nuclei ratio, such as3¯He/3He andˉt/t , are more sensitive to the QCP focusing effect.We thank Dr. Nu Xu for the fruitful discussions.
Search for QCD critical point by transverse velocity dependence of anti-deuteron to deuteron ratio
- Received Date: 2019-09-26
- Available Online: 2020-01-01
Abstract: We propose the transverse velocity (