<em>&alpha;</em> decay properties of <sup>296</sup>Og within the two-potential approach

Jun-Gang Deng; Jie-Cheng Zhao; Jiu-Long Chen; Xi-Jun Wu; Xiao-Hua Li

doi:10.1088/1674-1137/42/4/044102

Chinese Physics C> 2018, Vol. 42> Issue(4) : 044102 DOI: 10.1088/1674-1137/42/4/044102

α decay properties of ²⁹⁶Og within the two-potential approach

1.
School of Nuclear Science and Technology, University of South China, Hengyang 421001, China
2.
School of Math and Physics, University of South China, Hengyang 421001, China
3.
School of Nuclear Science and Technology, University of South China, Hengyang 421001, China
4.
Cooperative Innovation Center for Nuclear Fuel Cycle Technology &
5.
Key Laboratory of Low Dimensional Quantum Structures and Quantum Control, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China

Abstract
HTML
Reference
Related

PDF

Abstract：
The present work is a continuation of our previous paper[J.-G. Deng, et al., Chin. Phys. C, 41:124109 (2017)]. In the present work, the α decay half-life of the unknown nucleus ²⁹⁶Og is predicted within the two-potential approach and the hindrance factors of all 20 even-even nuclei in the same region as ²⁹⁶Og, i.e. proton number 82 < Z < 126 and neutron number 152 < N < 184, from ²⁵⁰Cm to ²⁹⁴Og, are extracted. The prediction is 1.09 ms within a factor of 5.12. In addition, based on the latest experimental data, a new set of parameters of α decay hindrance factors for the even-even nuclei in this region, considering the shell effect and proton-neutron interaction, are obtained.
- decay ,
- 296Og ,
- hindrance factor ,
- two-potential approach

References

[1]	S. G. Nilsson, C. F. Tsang, A. Sobiczewski, Z. Szymaski et al, Nucl. Phys. A, 131:1-66 (1969)
[2]	H. Meldner, Ark. Fys., 36:593-8 (1967)
[3]	A. Sobiczewski, F. Gareev, and B. Kalinkin, Phys. Lett., 22:500-502 (1962)
[4]	U. Mosel and W. Greiner, Z. Phys. A, 222:261-282 (1969)
[5]	K. P. Santhosh and C. Nithya, Phys. Rev. C, 94:054621 (2016)
[6]	Y. T. Oganessian, V. K. Utyonkov, Y. V. Lobanov, F. S. Abdullin et al, Phys. Rev. C, 76:011601 (2007)
[7]	Y. T. Oganessian, V. K. Utyonkov, Y. V. Lobanov, F. S. Abdullin et al, Phys. Rev. C, 74:044602 (2006)
[8]	Y. Oganessian, J. Phys. G, 34:R165 (2007)
[9]	Y. T. Oganessian, F. S. Abdullin, P. D. Bailey, D. E. Benker et al, Phys. Rev. Lett., 104:142502 (2010)
[10]	P. A. Ellison, K. E. Gregorich, J. S. Berryman et al, Phys. Rev. Lett., 105:182701 (2010)
[11]	S. Hofmann, S. Heinz, R. Mann, J. Maurer et al, Eur. Phys. J. A, 48:62 (2012)
[12]	Y. T. Oganessian and K. P. Rykaczewski, Phys. Today, 68:32-38 (2015)
[13]	A. Sobiczewski, Phys. Rev. C, 94:051302 (R) (2016)
[14]	X. J. Bao, S. Q. Guo, H. F. Zhang, and J. Q. Li, Phys. Rev. C, 95:034323 (2017)
[15]	A. Parkhomenko and A. Sobiczewski, Acta Phys. Pol. B, 36:3095 (2005)
[16]	P. Mller, J. R. Nix, W. D. Myers, and W. J. Swiatecki, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables, 59:185-381 (1995)
[17]	J. Duflo and A. P. Zuker, Phys. Rev. C, 52:R23-R27 (1995)
[18]	R. C. Nayak and L. Satpathy, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables, 98:616-719 (2012)
[19]	N. Wang and M. Liu, Phys. Rev. C, 84:051303 (R) (2011)
[20]	N. Wang, M. Liu, X. Wu, and J. Meng, Phys. Rev. C, 93:014302 (2016)
[21]	N. Wang, M. Liu, X. Wu, and J. Meng, Phys. Lett. B, 734:215-219 (2014)
[22]	I. Muntian, Z. Patyk, and A. Sobiczewski, Acta Phys. Pol. B, 32:691 (2001)
[23]	A. Sobiczewski and K. Pomorski, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys., 58:292-349 (2007)
[24]	A. N. Kuzmina, G. G. Adamian, N. V. Antonenko, and W. Scheid, Phys. Rev. C, 85:014139 (2012)
[25]	S. Goriely, N. Chamel, and J. M. Pearson, Phys. Rev. C, 93:034337 (2016)
[26]	S. Liran, A. Marinov, and N. Zeldes, Phys. Rev. C, 62:047301 (2000)
[27]	G. Audi, O. Bersillon, J. Blachot and A. Wapstra, Nucl. Phys. A, 729:3-128 (2003)
[28]	A. H. Wapstra, G. Audi and C. Thibault, Nucl. Phys. A, 729:129-336 (2003)
[29]	G. Audi, A. H. Wapstra and C Thibault, Nucl. Phys. A, 729:337-676 (2003)
[30]	P. Mohr, Phys. Rev. C, 95:011302 (R) (2017)
[31]	X.-D. Sun, P. Guo, and X.-H. Li, Phys. Rev. C, 93:034316 (2016)
[32]	X.-D. Sun, J.-G. Deng, D. Xiang, P. Guo, and X.-H. Li, Phys. Rev. C, 95:044303 (2017)
[33]	X.-D. Sun, C. Duan, J.-G. Deng, P. Guo, and X.-H. Li, Phys. Rev. C, 95:014319 (2017)
[34]	J.-G. Deng, J.-H. Cheng, B. Zheng and X.-H. Li, Chin. Phys. C, 41:124109 (2017)
[35]	S. A. Gurvitz and G. Kalbermann, Phys. Rev. Lett., 59:262-265 (1987)
[36]	S. A. Gurvitz, P. B. Semmes, W. Nazarewicz, and T. Vertse, Phys. Rev. A, 69:042705 (2004)
[37]	G. Audi, F. Kondev, M.Wang, W. Huang, and S. Naimi, Chin. Phys. C, 41:030001 (2017)
[38]	W. J. Huang, G. Audi, M.Wang, F. Kondev, S. Naimi, and X. Xu, Chin. Phys. C, 41:030002 (2017)
[39]	M. Wang, G. Audi, F. Kondev, W. J. Huang, S. Naimi, and X. Xu, Chin. Phys. C, 41:030003 (2017)
[40]	J.-G. Deng, J.-C. Zhao, D. Xiang and X.-H. Li, Phys. Rev. C, 96:024318 (2017)
[41]	Y. Qian and Z. Ren, Phys. Rev. C, 85:027306 (2012)
[42]	Y. Qian and Z. Ren, Nucl. Phys. A, 852:82-91 (2011)
[43]	Y. Qian, Z. Ren, and D. Ni, Nucl. Phys. A, 866:1-15 (2011)
[44]	X.-D. Sun, P. Guo, and X.-H. Li, Phys. Rev. C, 94:024338 (2016)
[45]	X.-D. Sun, X.-J. Wu, B. Zheng, D. Xiang, P. Guo, and X.-H. Li, Chin. Phys. C, 41:014102 (2017)
[46]	H. F. Zhang and G. Royer, Phys. Rev. C, 77:054318 (2008)
[47]	C. Qi, Rev. Phys., 1:77-89 (2016)
[48]	W. M. Seif, M. M. Botros, and A. I. Refaie, Phys. Rev. C, 92:044302 (2015)
[49]	C. Xu, Z. Ren, G. Rpke, P. Schuck et al, Phys. Rev. C, 93:011306 (R) (2016)
[50]	C. Xu, G. Rpke, P. Schuck, Z. Ren et al, Phys. Rev. C, 95:061306 (R) (2017)
[51]	C. Xu and Z. Ren, Nucl. Phys. A, 760:303-316 (2005)
[52]	S. Guo, X. Bao, Y. Gao, J. Li, and H. Zhang, Nucl. Phys. A, 934:110-120 (2015)
[53]	H. F. Zhang, G. Royer, Y. J. Wang, J. M. Dong, W. Zuo, and J. Q. Li, Phys. Rev. C, 80:057301 (2009)
[54]	B. Buck, A. C. Merchant, and S. M. Perez, Phys. Rev. Lett., 65:2975-2977 (1990)
[55]	G. Royer, J. Phys. G, 26:1149 (2000)
[56]	J. J. Morehead, J. Math. Phys., 36:5431-5452 (1995)
[57]	Y. J. Yao, G. L. Zhang, W. W. Qu and J. Q. Qian, Eur. Phys. J. A, 51:122 (2015)
[58]	K. P. Santhosh and B. Priyanka, Phys. Rev. C, 87:064611 (2013)

[1]	Yiling Xie , Hao Sun . Strong decay of $ { \boldsymbol Y({\bf{4230}}){\bf\to}\boldsymbol J/\boldsymbol\psi \boldsymbol f_{\bf 0}({\bf{980}}) }$ in light cone sum rules. Chinese Physics C, 2024, 48(2): 023105. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ad13f9
[2]	Wei Hua , Zhiyuan Zhang , Long Ma , Zaiguo Gan , Huabin Yang , Minghui Huang , Chunli Yang , Mingming Zhang , Yulin Tian , Xiaohong Zhou , Cenxi Yuan , Caiwan Shen , Long Zhu . α-decay study of ²¹⁸Ac and ²²¹Th in ⁴⁰Ar+¹⁸⁶W reaction. Chinese Physics C, 2021, 45(4): 044003. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/abe0bd
[3]	Xiao Pan , You-Tian Zou , Hong-Ming Liu , Biao He , Xiao-Hua Li , Xi-Jun Wu , Zhen Zhang . Systematic study of two-proton radioactivity half-lives using the two-potential and Skyrme-Hartree-Fock approaches. Chinese Physics C, 2021, 45(12): 124104. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ac2421
[4]	Virendrasinh Kher , Ajay Kumar Rai . Spectroscopy and decay properties of charmonium. Chinese Physics C, 2018, 42(8): 083101. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/42/8/083101
[5]	Jing Zhang , De-Jun E , Hong-Fei Zhang . Effects of shell correction on α decay properties. Chinese Physics C, 2018, 42(9): 094101. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/42/9/094101
[6]	Xiao-Dong Sun , Xi-Jun Wu , Bo Zheng , Dong Xiang , Ping Guo , Xiao-Hua Li . Systematic study of α preformation probability of nuclear isomeric and ground states. Chinese Physics C, 2017, 41(1): 014102. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/41/1/014102
[7]	Jun-Gang Deng , Jun-Hao Cheng , Bo Zheng , Xiao-Hua Li . α decay properties of ²⁹⁷Og within the two-potential approach. Chinese Physics C, 2017, 41(12): 124109. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/41/12/124109
[8]	Smruti Patel , P. C. Vinodkumar , Shashank Bhatnagar . Decay rates of charmonia within a quark-antiquark confining potential. Chinese Physics C, 2016, 40(5): 053102. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/40/5/053102
[9]	E. Javadimanesh , S. Zarrinkamar , H. Rahimov . An angle-dependent potential and alpha-decay half-lives ofdeformed nuclei for 67≤Z≤91. Chinese Physics C, 2013, 37(4): 044101. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/37/4/044101
[10]	ZHOU Zhi-Yong , WANG Qi-Chao , GAO Qing . Investigation of the rescattering effect in D decay. Chinese Physics C, 2011, 35(8): 708-712. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/35/8/002
[11]	E. Tomasi-Gustafsson (on behalf of the PANDA collaboration) . Form factor measurements with PANDA at FAIR. Chinese Physics C, 2010, 34(6): 863-868. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/34/6/041
[12]	XU Yuan-Guo , WANG Ru-Min , YANG Ya-Dong . Supersymmetric contributions to B_s→K^－π⁺ decay. Chinese Physics C, 2010, 34(11): 1687-1692. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/34/11/003
[13]	LI Bai-Qing , LI Rong , HE Zhi-Guo . η_b decay into charmonium in association with cc pair. Chinese Physics C, 2010, 34(5): 521-527. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/34/5/001
[14]	LIU Wei-Wei , LUO Zhi-Quan , ZHANG Jie , GAO Jie , BIAN Gang . Influence of super-strong magnetic field on the electron chemical potential and β decay in the stellar surroundings. Chinese Physics C, 2010, 34(8): 1090-1093. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/34/8/010
[15]	P. C. Vinodkumar . Decay properties of D and D_s mesons in coulomb plus power potential (CPP_ν). Chinese Physics C, 2010, 34(9): 1497-1499. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/34/9/083
[16]	ZHONG Bin , PING Rong-Gang , XIAO Zhen-Jun . Study of Λ decay parameter in J/ψ→ΛΛ decay. Chinese Physics C, 2008, 32(9): 692-696. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/32/9/003
[17]	Chen Guoming , Chen Gang . Identifying τ Hadronic Decay with Neutral Network. Chinese Physics C, 1995, 19(S3): 247-256.
[18]	Zhang Li , Jin Genming , Zhao Jinhua , Yang Weifan , Yang Yongfeng , Zhao Zhizheng , Zheng Jiwen , Sun Xiurong , Wang Jicheng , Li Zongwei , Qin Zhi , Guo Guanghui . Identification of ²⁰⁸Hg. Chinese Physics C, 1994, 18(Z1): 1-8.
[19]	Zhang Tianbao , Yang Guangming , Guo Baonian , Wang Haidong . Experimental Investigation of the Decay Rate of Orthopositronium. Chinese Physics C, 1992, 16(S2): 135-140.
[20]	Fan Wo , Zhao Zhizheng , Sun Xiuron , Mu Wantong , Ma Jiayu , Yang Weifan , Xie Xiujun , Zhao Lili , Yu Jusheng . The ⁷³Br Decay. Chinese Physics C, 1988, 12(S2): 199-208.

Access

Get Citation

Jun-Gang Deng, Jie-Cheng Zhao, Jiu-Long Chen, Xi-Jun Wu and Xiao-Hua Li. α decay properties of ²⁹⁶Og within the two-potential approach[J]. Chinese Physics C, 2018, 42(4): 044102. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/42/4/044102

RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)

BibTex

Txt

Milestone

Received: 2017-12-12

Fund

Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (11205083, 11505100), the Construct Program of the Key Discipline in Hunan Province, the Research Foundation of Education Bureau of Hunan Province, China (15A159), the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province, China (2015JJ3103, 2015JJ2121), the Innovation Group of Nuclear and Particle Physics in USC, the Shandong Province Natural Science Foundation, China (ZR2015AQ007) and Hunan Provincial Innovation Foundation For Postgraduate (CX2017B536)

Article Metric

Article Views(1679)
PDF Downloads(28)
Cited by(0)

Policy on re-use

To reuse of subscription content published by CPC, the users need to request permission from CPC, unless the content was published under an Open Access license which automatically permits that type of reuse.

通讯作者: 陈斌, [email protected]

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

α decay properties of ²⁹⁶Og within the two-potential approach

Abstract：

References

Access

Article Metrics

Metrics

通讯作者: 陈斌, [email protected]

Email This Article

α decay properties of ²⁹⁶Og within the two-potential approach

Corresponding author: Xi-Jun Wu,

Corresponding author: Xiao-Hua Li,

HTML

目录

α decay properties of 296Og within the two-potential approach

Abstract：

References

Access

Article Metrics

Metrics

通讯作者: 陈斌, [email protected]

Email This Article

α decay properties of 296Og within the two-potential approach

Corresponding author: Xi-Jun Wu,

Corresponding author: Xiao-Hua Li,

HTML

目录

α decay properties of ²⁹⁶Og within the two-potential approach

α decay properties of ²⁹⁶Og within the two-potential approach