The AME2016 atomic mass evaluation (II). Tables, graphs and references

Meng Wang; G. Audi; F. G. Kondev; W. J. Huang; S. Naimi; Xing Xu

doi:10.1088/1674-1137/41/3/030003

Chinese Physics C> 2017, Vol. 41> Issue(3) : 030003 DOI: 10.1088/1674-1137/41/3/030003

The AME2016 atomic mass evaluation (II). Tables, graphs and references

Meng Wang ^1,2,, ,
G. Audi ³ ,
F. G. Kondev ⁴ ,
W. J. Huang ³ ,
S. Naimi ⁵ ,
Xing Xu ¹

Abstract
HTML
Reference
Related

PDF

Abstract：
This paper is the second part of the new evaluation of atomic masses, AME2016. Using least-squares adjustments to all evaluated and accepted experimental data, described in Part I, we derive tables with numerical values and graphs to replace those given in AME2012. The first table lists the recommended atomic mass values and their uncertainties. It is followed by a table of the influences of data on primary nuclides, a table of various reaction and decay energies, and finally, a series of graphs of separation and decay energies. The last section of this paper lists all references of the input data used in the AME2016 and the NUBASE2016 evaluations (first paper in this issue).
- atomic mass evaluation ,
- atomic mass table ,
- separation and reaction energies ,
- trends from the mass surface

References

[1]	G. Audi, M. Wang, A.H. Wapstra, F.G. Kondev, M. MacCormick, X. Xu and B. Pfeiffer, Chin. Phys. C, 36: 1287 (2012)
[2]	M. Wang, G. Audi, A.H. Wapstra, F.G. Kondev, M. MacCormick, X. Xu and B. Pfeiffer, Chin. Phys. C, 36: 1603 (2012)
[3]	A.H. Wapstra, G. Audi and C. Thibault, Nucl. Phys. A, 729:129 (2003)
[4]	G. Audi, A.H. Wapstra and C. Thibault, Nucl. Phys. A, 729:337 (2003)
[5]	G. Audi and A.H. Wapstra, Nucl. Phys. A, 595: 409 (1995)
[6]	G. Audi and A.H. Wapstra, Nucl. Phys. A, 565: 1 (1993)
[7]	G. Audi and A.H. Wapstra, Nucl. Phys. A, 565: 66 (1993)
[8]	C. Borcea, G. Audi, A.H. Wapstra and P. Favaron, Nucl. Phys. A, 565: 158 (1993)
[9]	G. Audi, A.H. Wapstra and M. Dedieu, Nucl. Phys. A, 565:193 (1993)
[10]	K.-N. Huang, M. Aoyagi, M.H. Chen, B. Crasemann and H. Mark, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 18: 243 (1976)
[11]	D. Lunney, J.M. Pearson and C. Thibault, Rev. Mod. Phys. 75: 1021 (2003)
[12]	B. Pritychenko, E. Bětk, M.A. Kellett, B. Singh and J. Totans, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A, 640: 213 (2011)

[1]	W.J. Huang , Meng Wang , Kondev F.G. , Audi G. , S. Naimi . The AME 2020 atomic mass evaluation (I). Evaluation of input data, and adjustment procedures. Chinese Physics C, 2021, 45(3): 030002. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/abddb0
[2]	Meng Wang , W.J. Huang , Kondev F.G. , Audi G. , S. Naimi . The AME 2020 atomic mass evaluation (II). Tables, graphs and references. Chinese Physics C, 2021, 45(3): 030003. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/abddaf
[3]	V. Yu. Denisov;O. A. Belyanovska;V. P. Khomenkov;I. Yu. Sedykh;K. M. Sukhyy . A simple description of the temperature dependence of the width of the fission-fragment mass yield in $\bf^{197}$Au and $\bf^{209}$Bi at intermediate energies. Chinese Physics C, 2019, df87c41e-622f-49a7-b081-5c584df157aa(11): 14101-.
[4]	W. J. Huang , G. Audi , Meng Wang , F. G. Kondev , S. Naimi , Xing Xu . The AME2016 atomic mass evaluation (I). Evaluation of input data; and adjustment procedures. Chinese Physics C, 2017, 41(3): 030002. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/41/3/030002
[5]	Zhi-Jin Jiang , Yan Huang , Jie Wang . A combined model for pseudorapidity distributions in p-pcollisions at center-of-mass energies from 23.6 to 7000 GeV. Chinese Physics C, 2016, 40(7): 074104. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/40/7/074104
[6]	Yujiang Bi , Hao Cai , Ying Chen , Ming Gong , Zhaofeng Liu , Hao-Xue Qiao , Yi-Bo Yang . Diquark mass differences from unquenched lattice QCD. Chinese Physics C, 2016, 40(7): 073106. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/40/7/073106
[7]	M. Ablikim , M. N. Achasov , X. C. Ai , O. Albayrak , M. Albrecht , D. J. Ambrose . Measurements of the center-of-mass energies at BESIII via the di-muon process. Chinese Physics C, 2016, 40(6): 063001. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/40/6/063001
[8]	Jing Tang , Zhong-Ming Niu , Jian-You Guo . Influence of binding energies of electrons on nuclear mass predictions. Chinese Physics C, 2016, 40(7): 074102. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/40/7/074102
[9]	Lin-Feng Zhang , Xue-Wei Xia . Global α-decay study based on the mass table of the relativistic continuum Hartree-Bogoliubov theory. Chinese Physics C, 2016, 40(5): 054102. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/40/5/054102
[10]	M. Ablikim , M. N. Achasov , X. C. Ai , et al. (BESⅢ Collaboration) . Precision measurement of the integrated luminosity of the data taken by BESIII at center-of-mass energies between 3.810 GeV and 4.600 GeV. Chinese Physics C, 2015, 39(9): 093001. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/39/9/093001
[11]	M. Ablikim , M. N. Achasov , X. C. Ai , et al. (BESⅢ collaboration) . Evidence for e⁺e^-→γχ_c1,2 at center-of-mass energies from 4.009 to 4.360 GeV. Chinese Physics C, 2015, 39(4): 041001. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/39/4/041001
[12]	SUN Xiao-Jun , YU Cheng-Gang , WANG Ning , YANG Yong-Xu , PAN Cheng-Hua . Pre-neutron-emission mass distributions for reaction²³⁸U(n, f) up to 60 MeV. Chinese Physics C, 2015, 39(1): 014102. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/39/1/014102
[13]	SONG Li-Hua , LIU Na , DUAN Chun-Gui . Atomic mass dependence of hadron production in semi-inclusive deep inelastic lepton-nucleus scattering. Chinese Physics C, 2013, 37(8): 084102. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/37/8/084102
[14]	G. Audi , A.H. Wapstra , F.G. Kondev , M. MacCormick , X. Xu , B. Pfeiffer . The AME2012 atomic mass evaluation (II). Tables, graphs and references. Chinese Physics C, 2012, 36(12): 1603-2014. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/36/12/003
[15]	M. Wang , A.H. Wapstra , F.G. Kondev , M. MacCormick , X. Xu , B. Pfeiffer . The AME2012 atomic mass evaluation (I). Evaluation of input data, adjustment procedures. Chinese Physics C, 2012, 36(12): 1287-1602. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/36/12/002
[16]	XIE Wen-Jie , YANG De , WANG Cui-Ping , WANG Zhi-Gang . Transverse mass distributions in central heavy-ion collisions at high energies. Chinese Physics C, 2011, 35(4): 355-362. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/35/4/007
[17]	XIE Wen-Jie . Transverse mass distributions of protons produced in heavy-ion collisions at high energies. Chinese Physics C, 2010, 34(11): 1717-1723. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/34/11/010
[18]	CHEN Yong-Shou , GAO Zao-Chun . Triaxial rotation in atomic nuclei. Chinese Physics C, 2009, 33(S1): 1-4. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/33/S1/001
[19]	HUANG Wen-Xue , XIAO Guo-Qing , WANG Yue , TIAN Yu-Lin , ZHU Zhi-Chao , XU Hu-Shan , ZHAN Wen-Long . High precision mass measurement and LPT. Chinese Physics C, 2008, 32(S2): 197-200.
[20]	ZHANG QI-REN . SURFACE ENERGIES OF ATOMIC NUCLEI AND THE MASS OF THE SCALAR MESON. Chinese Physics C, 1979, 3(1): 75-79.

Access

Get Citation

Meng Wang, G. Audi, F. G. Kondev, W. J. Huang, S. Naimi and Xing Xu. The AME2016 atomic mass evaluation (II). Tables, graphs and references[J]. Chinese Physics C, 2017, 41(3): 030003. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/41/3/030003

RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)

BibTex

Txt

Milestone

Received: 2017-03-10

Fund

This work has been undertaken with the endorsement of the IUPAP Commission on Symbols, Units, Nomenclature, Atomic Masses and Fundamental Constants (SUNAMCO).

Article Metric

Article Views(3028)
PDF Downloads(198)
Cited by(0)

Policy on re-use

To reuse of subscription content published by CPC, the users need to request permission from CPC, unless the content was published under an Open Access license which automatically permits that type of reuse.

通讯作者: 陈斌, [email protected]

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

The AME2016 atomic mass evaluation (II). Tables, graphs and references

Corresponding author: Meng Wang,

Received Date: 2017-03-10

Available Online: 2017-03-05

Fund Project: This work has been undertaken with the endorsement of the IUPAP Commission on Symbols, Units, Nomenclature, Atomic Masses and Fundamental Constants (SUNAMCO).

Abstract: This paper is the second part of the new evaluation of atomic masses, AME2016. Using least-squares adjustments to all evaluated and accepted experimental data, described in Part I, we derive tables with numerical values and graphs to replace those given in AME2012. The first table lists the recommended atomic mass values and their uncertainties. It is followed by a table of the influences of data on primary nuclides, a table of various reaction and decay energies, and finally, a series of graphs of separation and decay energies. The last section of this paper lists all references of the input data used in the AME2016 and the NUBASE2016 evaluations (first paper in this issue).

HTML

Reference (12)

The AME2016 atomic mass evaluation (II). Tables, graphs and references

Abstract：

References

Access

Article Metrics

Metrics

通讯作者: 陈斌, [email protected]

Email This Article