The NUBASE2016 evaluation of nuclear properties

G. Audi; F. G. Kondev; Meng Wang; W. J. Huang; S. Naimi

doi:10.1088/1674-1137/41/3/030001

Chinese Physics C> 2017, Vol. 41> Issue(3) : 030001 DOI: 10.1088/1674-1137/41/3/030001

The NUBASE2016 evaluation of nuclear properties

G. Audi ¹ ,
F. G. Kondev ² ,
Meng Wang ^3,4,, ,
W. J. Huang ¹ ,
S. Naimi ⁵

Abstract
HTML
Reference
Related

PDF

Abstract：
This paper presents the NUBASE2016 evaluation that contains the recommended values for nuclear and decay properties of 3437 nuclides in their ground and excited isomeric (T_1/2≥100 ns) states. All nuclides for which any experimental information is known were considered. NUBASE2016 covers all data published by October 2016 in primary (journal articles) and secondary (mainly laboratory reports and conference proceedings) references, together with the corresponding bibliographical information. During the development of NUBASE2016, the data available in the "Evaluated Nuclear Structure Data File" (ENSDF) database were consulted and critically assessed for their validity and completeness. Furthermore, a large amount of new data and some older experimental results that were missing from ENSDF were compiled, evaluated and included in NUBASE2016. The atomic mass values were taken from the "Atomic Mass Evaluation" (AME2016, second and third parts of the present issue). In cases where no experimental data were available for a particular nuclide, trends in the behavior of specific properties in neighboring nuclides (TNN) were examined. This approach allowed to estimate values for a range of properties that are labeled in NUBASE2016 as "non-experimental" (flagged "#"). Evaluation procedures and policies used during the development of this database are presented, together with a detailed table of recommended values and their uncertainties.
- NUBASE2016 evaluation ,
- nuclear properties ,
- Atomic Mass Evaluation (AME) ,
- excitation energies of isomers ,
- Evaluated Nuclear Structure Data File (ENSDF)

References

[1]	G. Audi, O. Bersillon, J. Blachot and A. H. Wapstra, Nucl. Phys. A, 624: 1-124 (1997)
[2]	G. Audi, O. Bersillon, J. Blachot and A. H. Wapstra, Nucl. Phys. A, 729: 3 (2003)
[3]	Edited by Yu. Litvinov and K. Blaum, Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 349-350: (2013)
[4]	T. Goigoux et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 117: 162501 (2016)
[5]	L. hrstrm and J. Reedijk, Pure Appl. Chem. 88: 1225 (2016)
[6]	C.J. Gallagher, Jr. and S. A. Moszkowski, Phys. Rev. 111: 1282 (1958)
[7]	M. MacCormick and G. Audi, Nucl. Phys. A, 925: 61 (2014)
[8]	E. P. Wigner, in Proceedings of the Robert A. Welch Foundation Conference on Chemical Research, edited by W. O. Milligan (Houston: Welch Foundation, 1958), Vol. 1, p. 88
[9]	M. S. Antony, J. Britz, J. B. Bueb and A. Pape, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables, 33: 447 (1985) M. S. Antony, J. Britz and A. Pape, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables, 34: 279 (1985) A. Pape and M. S. Antony, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables, 39: 201 (1988) M. S. Antony, J. Britz and A. Pape, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables, 40: 9 (1988)
[10]	J. C. Hardy, I. S. Towner, Phys. Rev. C, 91: 025501 (2015)
[11]	General Policies, Nuclear Data Sheets, 113: (2012) v
[12]	A. MacDonald, B. Karamy, K. Setoodehnia, B. Singh, Nucl. Data Sheets 114: 397 (2013)
[13]	J. Honkanen, J. yst and K. Eskola, Phys. Scr. 34: (1986) 608
[14]	P. G. Hansen and B. Jonson, Particle Emission from Nuclei, Vol.3, p. 157, CRC Press, Florida (1989)
[15]	M. Thoennessen, Rep. Prog. Phys., 76: 056301 (2013) and references therein
[16]	O. Bersillon and J. Blachot, NEANDC(E) 246/L, INDC(FR) 071/L, September 1991
[17]	https://www-nds.iaea.org/amdc/
[18]	R. D. Evans, The Atomic Nucleus (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1955) p. 766

[1]	Meng Wang , W.J. Huang , Kondev F.G. , Audi G. , S. Naimi . The AME 2020 atomic mass evaluation (II). Tables, graphs and references. Chinese Physics C, 2021, 45(3): 030003. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/abddaf
[2]	Kondev F.G. , M. Wang , W.J. Huang , S. Naimi , Audi G. . The NUBASE2020 evaluation of nuclear physics properties. Chinese Physics C, 2021, 45(3): 030001. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/abddae
[3]	W.J. Huang , Meng Wang , Kondev F.G. , Audi G. , S. Naimi . The AME 2020 atomic mass evaluation (I). Evaluation of input data, and adjustment procedures. Chinese Physics C, 2021, 45(3): 030002. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/abddb0
[4]	Ya-Fei Guo , Peng-Hui Chen , Fei Niu , Hong-Fei Zhang , Gen-Ming Jin , Zhao-Qing Feng . Isospin splitting of nucleon effective mass and symmetry energy in isotopic nuclear reactions. Chinese Physics C, 2017, 41(10): 104104. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/41/10/104104
[5]	Meng Wang , G. Audi , F. G. Kondev , W. J. Huang , S. Naimi , Xing Xu . The AME2016 atomic mass evaluation (II). Tables, graphs and references. Chinese Physics C, 2017, 41(3): 030003. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/41/3/030003
[6]	W. J. Huang , G. Audi , Meng Wang , F. G. Kondev , S. Naimi , Xing Xu . The AME2016 atomic mass evaluation (I). Evaluation of input data; and adjustment procedures. Chinese Physics C, 2017, 41(3): 030002. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/41/3/030002
[7]	Jing Tang , Zhong-Ming Niu , Jian-You Guo . Influence of binding energies of electrons on nuclear mass predictions. Chinese Physics C, 2016, 40(7): 074102. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/40/7/074102
[8]	Mahesh K , Manoj K . Nuclear structure study of some bubble nuclei in the light mass region using mean field formalism. Chinese Physics C, 2015, 39(6): 064102. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/39/6/064102
[9]	ANG Pei , ZUO Wei . Three-body force effect on the properties of nuclear matter underthe gap and continuous choices within the BHF approach. Chinese Physics C, 2014, 38(8): 084102. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/38/8/084102
[10]	CHEN Guo-Chang , CAO Wen-Tian , YU Bao-Sheng , TANG Guo-You , SHI Zhao-Min , TAO Xi . Neutron nuclear data evaluation of actinide nuclei for CENDL-3.1. Chinese Physics C, 2012, 36(9): 823-826. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/36/9/005
[11]	G. Audi , A.H. Wapstra , F.G. Kondev , M. MacCormick , X. Xu , B. Pfeiffer . The AME2012 atomic mass evaluation (II). Tables, graphs and references. Chinese Physics C, 2012, 36(12): 1603-2014. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/36/12/003
[12]	M. Wang , A.H. Wapstra , F.G. Kondev , M. MacCormick , X. Xu , B. Pfeiffer . The AME2012 atomic mass evaluation (I). Evaluation of input data, adjustment procedures. Chinese Physics C, 2012, 36(12): 1287-1602. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/36/12/002
[13]	F.G. Kondev , M. Wang , B. Pfeiffer , X. Sun , J. Blachot , M. MacCormick . The NUBASE2012 evaluation of nuclear properties. Chinese Physics C, 2012, 36(12): 1157-1286. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/36/12/001
[14]	ZOU Wen-Hua , TIAN Yuan , SHEN Shui-Fa , GU Jian-Zhong , PENG Bang-Bao , ZHANG Di-Da , MA Zhong-Yu . Nuclear structure around ⁸⁰Zr. Chinese Physics C, 2010, 34(1): 56-61. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/34/1/010
[15]	YE Wei . Surveying the role of excitation energy in probing nuclear dissipation. Chinese Physics C, 2009, 33(7): 528-531. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/33/7/005
[16]	ZUO Wei . Single particle properties in asymmetric nuclear matter and TBF rearrangement effect. Chinese Physics C, 2008, 32(S2): 64-69.
[17]	WEN Wu , SHEN Hong . Nucleon properties in the nuclear medium. Chinese Physics C, 2008, 32(S2): 81-84.
[18]	Wei Zhiyong , Zhu Yongtai . Influence of IMF Internal Excitation on the Extraction of the Isotope Nuclear Temperature. Chinese Physics C, 1997, 21(S3): 57-62.
[19]	Liu Lianggang , Ma Weixing , Jiang Huanqing . Particle-Hole and Delta-Hole Excitation in Nuclear Mater. Chinese Physics C, 1994, 18(S4): 391-398.
[20]	Huo Yukun , Zhang Baohui , Yuan Zhushu . Nuclear Excitation by Electron Transition and γ-Ray Laser. Chinese Physics C, 1992, 16(S3): 321-328.

Access

Get Citation

G. Audi, F. G. Kondev, Meng Wang, W. J. Huang and S. Naimi. The NUBASE2016 evaluation of nuclear properties[J]. Chinese Physics C, 2017, 41(3): 030001. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/41/3/030001

G. Audi, F. G. Kondev, Meng Wang, W. J. Huang and S. Naimi. The NUBASE2016 evaluation of nuclear properties[J]. Chinese Physics C, 2017, 41(3): 030001. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/41/3/030001 shu

RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)

BibTex

Txt

Milestone

Received: 2017-03-10

Fund

This work has been undertaken with the endorsement of the IUPAP Commission on Symbols, Units, Nomenclature, Atomic Masses and Fundamental Constants (SUNAMCO).

Article Metric

Article Views(2367)
PDF Downloads(225)
Cited by(0)

Policy on re-use

To reuse of subscription content published by CPC, the users need to request permission from CPC, unless the content was published under an Open Access license which automatically permits that type of reuse.

通讯作者: 陈斌, [email protected]

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

The NUBASE2016 evaluation of nuclear properties

Corresponding author: Meng Wang,

Received Date: 2017-03-10

Available Online: 2017-03-05

Fund Project: This work has been undertaken with the endorsement of the IUPAP Commission on Symbols, Units, Nomenclature, Atomic Masses and Fundamental Constants (SUNAMCO).

Abstract: This paper presents the NUBASE2016 evaluation that contains the recommended values for nuclear and decay properties of 3437 nuclides in their ground and excited isomeric (T_1/2≥100 ns) states. All nuclides for which any experimental information is known were considered. NUBASE2016 covers all data published by October 2016 in primary (journal articles) and secondary (mainly laboratory reports and conference proceedings) references, together with the corresponding bibliographical information. During the development of NUBASE2016, the data available in the "Evaluated Nuclear Structure Data File" (ENSDF) database were consulted and critically assessed for their validity and completeness. Furthermore, a large amount of new data and some older experimental results that were missing from ENSDF were compiled, evaluated and included in NUBASE2016. The atomic mass values were taken from the "Atomic Mass Evaluation" (AME2016, second and third parts of the present issue). In cases where no experimental data were available for a particular nuclide, trends in the behavior of specific properties in neighboring nuclides (TNN) were examined. This approach allowed to estimate values for a range of properties that are labeled in NUBASE2016 as "non-experimental" (flagged "#"). Evaluation procedures and policies used during the development of this database are presented, together with a detailed table of recommended values and their uncertainties.

HTML

Reference (18)

The NUBASE2016 evaluation of nuclear properties

Abstract：

References

Access

Article Metrics

Metrics

通讯作者: 陈斌, [email protected]

Email This Article