Impact factor of Chinese Physics C is 3.6 in 2023 Impact factor of Chinese Physics C is 3.6 in 2022 2021 Impact Factor 2.944
Advanced Search
×
近期发现有不法分子冒充我刊与作者联系，借此进行欺诈等不法行为，请广大作者加以鉴别，如遇诈骗行为，请第一时间与我刊编辑部联系确认（《中国物理C》（英文）编辑部电话：010-88235947,010-88236950），并作报警处理。
本刊再次郑重声明：
（1）本刊官方网址为cpc.ihep.ac.cn和https://iopscience.iop.org/journal/1674-1137
（2）本刊采编系统作者中心是投稿的唯一路径，该系统为ScholarOne远程稿件采编系统，仅在本刊投稿网网址（https://mc03.manuscriptcentral.com/cpc）设有登录入口。本刊不接受其他方式的投稿，如打印稿投稿、E-mail信箱投稿等，若以此种方式接收投稿均为假冒。
（3）所有投稿均需经过严格的同行评议、编辑加工后方可发表，本刊不存在所谓的“编辑部内部征稿”。如果有人以“编辑部内部人员”名义帮助作者发稿，并收取发表费用，均为假冒。
                  
《中国物理C》（英文）编辑部
2024年10月30日
Chinese Physics C> 2017, Vol. 41> Issue(10) : 104001 DOI: 10.1088/1674-1137/41/10/104001

Influence of breakup on elastic and α-production channels in the 6Li+116Sn reaction

  • 1.

      CAS Key Laboratory of High Precision Nuclear Spectroscopy and Center for Nuclear Matter Science, Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China

  • 2.

      Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, The M. S. University of Baroda, Vadodara-390002, India

  • 3.

      INFN Laboratori Nazionali del Sud, Catania, Italy

  • 4.

      Instituto de Fisica, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Av. Litoranea s/n, Gragoatmá

  • 5.

      Instituto de Aplicaç

  • 6.

      Nuclear Physics Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai-400085, India

  • The effects of breakup reactions on elastic and α-production channels for the 6Li+116Sn system have been investigated at energies below and near the Coulomb barrier. The angular distributions of α-particle production differential cross sections have been obtained at several projectile energies between 22 and 40 MeV. The measured breakup α-particle differential cross sections and elastic scattering angular distributions have been compared with the predictions of continuum-discretized coupled channels (CDCC) calculations. The influence of breakup coupling has also been investigated by extracting dynamic polarization potentials (DPP) from the CDCC calculations. From the predictions of CDCC calculations the relative importance of the nuclear, Coulomb, and total breakup contributions have also been investigated. The nuclear breakup couplings are observed to play an important role in comparison to the Coulomb breakup for the direct breakup mechanisms associated in the reaction of 6Li projectile with 116Sn target nuclei. The influence of strong nuclear breakup coupling exhibits suppression in the Coulomb-nuclear interference peak. The direct breakup cross sections from the CDCC calculations under-predict the measured α-particle differential cross sections at all energies. This suggests that the measured α particles may also have contributions from other possible breakup reaction channels.
      PCAS:
  • 加载中

  • References

    [1] L. F. Canto, P. R. S. Gomes, R. Donangelo, and M. S. Hussein, Phys. Rep., 424:1(2006)
    [2] N. Keeley, R. Raabe, N. Alamanos, and J. L. Sida, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys., 59:579(2007)
    [3] N. Keeley, N. Alamanos, K. W. Kemper, and K. Rusek, Prog. Part. Nucl. Sci., 63:396(2009)
    [4] D. Patel, S. Santra, S. Mukherjee, B. K.Nayak, P. K. Rath, V. V. Parkar, and R. K. Choudhury, Pramana-J. Phys., 81:587(2013)
    [5] B. B. Back, H. Esbensen, C. L. Jiang, and K. E. Rehm, Rev. Mod. Phys., 86:317(2014)
    [6] L. F. Canto, P. R. S. Gomes, R. Donangelo, J. Lubian, and M. S. Hussein, Phys. Rep., 596:1(2015)
    [7] P. R. S. Gomes, J. Lubian, L. F. Canto et al, Few-Body Syst., 57:165(2016)
    [8] J. J. Kolata, V. Guimarm es, E. F. Aguilera, Eur. Phys. J. A, 52:123(2016)
    [9] D. Patel, S. Mukherjee, B. K. Nayak, S. V. Suryanarayana, D. C. Biswas, E. T. Mirgule, Y. K. Gupta, L. S. Danu, B. V. John, and A. Saxena, Phys. Rev. C, 89:064614(2014)
    [10] M. S. Hussein, P. R. S. Gomes, J. Lubian, and L. C. Chamon, Phys. Rev. C, 73:044610(2006)
    [11] S. Dubey, S. Mukherjee, D. C. Biswas et al, Phys. Rev. C, 89:014610(2014)
    [12] S. Santra, S. Kailas, K. Ramachandran, V. V. Parkar, V. Jha, B. J. Roy, and P. Shukla, Phys. Rev. C, 83:034616(2011)
    [13] L. F. Canto, J. Lubian, P. R. S. Gomes, and M. S. Hussein, Phys. Rev. C, 80:047601(2009)
    [14] N. Keeley and K. Rusek, Phys. Lett. B, 427:1-6(1998)
    [15] J. Lubian, T. Correa, B. Paes et al, Nucl. Phys. A, 791:24(2007)
    [16] D. Patel, S. Mukherjee, D. C. Biswas, B. K. Nayak, Y. K. Gupta, L. S. Danu, S. Santra, and E. T. Mirgule, Phys. Rev. C, 91:054614(2015)
    [17] E. F. Aguilera et al, Phys. Rev. Lett., 84:5058(2000)
    [18] C. Signorini et al, Phys. Rev. C, 67:044607(2003)
    [19] K. O. Pfeiffer, E. Speth, and K. Bethge, Nucl. Phys. A, 206:545(1973)
    [20] H. Utsunomiya, S. Kubono, M. H. Tanaka, M. Sugitani, K. Morita, T. Nomura, and Y. Hamajima, Phys. Rev. C, 28:1975(1983)
    [21] D. Patel, S. V. Suryanarayana, S. Mukherjee, B. K. Nayak, E. T. Mirgule, D. C. Biswas, A. Saxena, and J. Lubian, EPJ Web of Conf. v., 86:00032(2015)
    [22] M. K. Pradhan, A. Mukherjee, Subinit Roy, P. Basu, A. Goswami, R. Kshetri, R. Palit, V. V. Parkar, M. Ray, M. Saha Sarkar, and S. Santra, Phys. Rev. C, 88:064603(2013)
    [23] D. Chattopadhyay, S. Santra, A. Pal et al, Phys. Rev. C, 94:061602(R) (2016)
    [24] A. Shrivastava, A. Navin, N. Keeley, K. Mahata, K. Ramachandran, V. Nanal, V. V. Parkar, A. Chatterjee, and S. Kailas, Phys. Lett. B, 633:463(2006)
    [25] D. H. Luong, M. Dasgupta, D. J. Hinde, R. du Rietz, R. Rafiei, C. J. Lin, M. Evers, and A. Diaz-Torres, Phys. Rev. C, 88:034609(2013)
    [26] J. J. Kolata, Phys. Rev. C, 63:061604(R) (2001)
    [27] N. N. Deshmukh, S. Mukherjee, D. Patel et al, Phys. Rev. C, 83:024607(2011)
    [28] M. Kamimura, M. Yahiro, Y. Iseri, Y. Sakuragi, H. Kameyama, M. Kaway, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl., 89:1(1986)
    [29] N. Austern, Y. Iseri, M. Kamimura, M. Kawai, G. Rawitscher, M. Yahiro, Phys. Rep., 154:125(1987)
    [30] A. Diaz-Torres, I. J. Thompson, C. Beck, Phys. Rev. C, 68:044607(2003)
    [31] D. R. Otomar, J. Lubian, P. R. S. Gomes et al, Phys. Rev. C 80:034614(2009)
    [32] L. C. Chamon et al., Phys. Rev. C, 66:014610(2002)
    [33] I. J. Thompson, Comput. Phys. Rep., 167:7(1988)
    [34] J. Rangel, J. Lubian, L. F. Canto, and P. R. S. Gomes, Phys. Rev. C, 93:054610(2016)
    [35] A. Di Pietro, V. Scuderi, A. M. Moro et al, Phys. Rev. C, 85:054607(2012)
    [36] N. Keeley, N. Alamanos, K. W. Kemper, and K. Rusek, Phys. Rev. C, 82:034606(2010)
    [37] D. R. Otomar, P. R. S. Gomes, J. Lubian, L. F. Canto, and M. S. Hussein, Phys. Rev. C, 87:014615(2013)
    [38] I. J. Thompson et al, Nucl. Phys. A, 505:84(1989)
    [39] H. Kumawat, V. Jha, B. J. Roy, V. V. Parkar, S. Santra, V. Kumar, D. Dutta, P. Shukla, L. M. Pant, A. K. Mohanty, R. K. Choudhury, and S. Kailas Phys. Rev. C, 78:044617(2008)
    [40] S. Santra, V. V. Parkar, K. Ramachandran, U. K. Pal, A. Shrivastava, B. J. Roy, B. K. Nayak, A. Chatterjee, R. K. Choudhury, S. Kailas, Phys. Lett. B, 677:139-144(2009)
    [41] Shradha Dubey, S. Mukherjee, D. C. Biswas et al, Phys. Rev. C, 89:014610(2014)
    [42] G. R. Kelly, N. J. Davis, R. P. Ward et al, Phys. Rev. C, 63:024601(2000)
    [43] G. R. Satchler, Phys. Rep., 199:147(1991)
    [44] A. Gavron, Phys. Rev. C, 21:230(1980)
    [45] Jin Lei and A. M. Moro, Phys. Rev. C, 95:044605(2017)
    [46] Jin Lei and A. M. Moro, Phys. Rev. C, 92:044616(2015)

  • Access

    加载中

Get Citation
D. Patel, S. Mukherjee, N. Deshmukh, J. Lubian, Jian-Song Wang, T. Correa, B. K. Nayak, Yan-Yun Yang, Wei-Hu Ma, D. C. Biswas, Y. K. Gupta, S. Santra, E. T. Mirgule, L. S. Danu, N. L. Singh and A. Saxena. Influence of breakup on elastic and α-production channels in the 6Li+116Sn reaction[J]. Chinese Physics C, 2017, 41(10): 104001. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/41/10/104001
D. Patel, S. Mukherjee, N. Deshmukh, J. Lubian, Jian-Song Wang, T. Correa, B. K. Nayak, Yan-Yun Yang, Wei-Hu Ma, D. C. Biswas, Y. K. Gupta, S. Santra, E. T. Mirgule, L. S. Danu, N. L. Singh and A. Saxena. Influence of breakup on elastic and α-production channels in the 6Li+116Sn reaction[J]. Chinese Physics C, 2017, 41(10): 104001.  doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/41/10/104001 shu
Milestone
Received: 2017-05-03
Fund

    One of the authors (SM) would like to thank DAE-BRNS for financial assistance through a major research project. This work is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (U1432247, 11575256, U1632138, 11605253) and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2016M602906)

Article Metric

Article Views(1711)
PDF Downloads(79)
Cited by(0)
Policy on re-use
To reuse of subscription content published by CPC, the users need to request permission from CPC, unless the content was published under an Open Access license which automatically permits that type of reuse.
通讯作者: 陈斌, [email protected]
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Email This Article

Title:
Email:

Influence of breakup on elastic and α-production channels in the 6Li+116Sn reaction

  • 1.  CAS Key Laboratory of High Precision Nuclear Spectroscopy and Center for Nuclear Matter Science, Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China
  • 2.  Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, The M. S. University of Baroda, Vadodara-390002, India
  • 3.  INFN Laboratori Nazionali del Sud, Catania, Italy
  • 4.  Instituto de Fisica, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Av. Litoranea s/n, Gragoatmá
  • 5.  Instituto de Aplicaç
  • 6.  Nuclear Physics Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai-400085, India
  • Received Date: 2017-05-03
  • Available Online: 2017-10-05
Fund Project:  One of the authors (SM) would like to thank DAE-BRNS for financial assistance through a major research project. This work is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (U1432247, 11575256, U1632138, 11605253) and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2016M602906)

Abstract: The effects of breakup reactions on elastic and α-production channels for the 6Li+116Sn system have been investigated at energies below and near the Coulomb barrier. The angular distributions of α-particle production differential cross sections have been obtained at several projectile energies between 22 and 40 MeV. The measured breakup α-particle differential cross sections and elastic scattering angular distributions have been compared with the predictions of continuum-discretized coupled channels (CDCC) calculations. The influence of breakup coupling has also been investigated by extracting dynamic polarization potentials (DPP) from the CDCC calculations. From the predictions of CDCC calculations the relative importance of the nuclear, Coulomb, and total breakup contributions have also been investigated. The nuclear breakup couplings are observed to play an important role in comparison to the Coulomb breakup for the direct breakup mechanisms associated in the reaction of 6Li projectile with 116Sn target nuclei. The influence of strong nuclear breakup coupling exhibits suppression in the Coulomb-nuclear interference peak. The direct breakup cross sections from the CDCC calculations under-predict the measured α-particle differential cross sections at all energies. This suggests that the measured α particles may also have contributions from other possible breakup reaction channels.

    HTML

Reference (46)

目录

Link
IOPScience
SCOAP3
arXiv
Chinese Physical Society
Journal information
Introduction
Editorial Board
Others
Subscribe
Contact us
QQ: 1307685413
Tel: +86-010-88235947
Fax: +86-010-88233126
E-mail: [email protected]

  • CPC Website

  • IOP Website

  • CPC WeChat

Copyright © Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 19B Yuquan Road, Beijing 100049, China 京ICP备05002789号-1

Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd  E-mail: [email protected]

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return